GOOD FAITH FOR THE COMMON GOOD

Good Faith and the Co= mmon Good

Occasional Offeri= ngs from Sam Candler on issues of faith, church, and the world.<= /p>

= THE OMNIVORE’S DILEMMA AND GROWTH FOR GROWTH’S SAKE

I m= ust admit that I like large churches. I like the suggestion that their sheer si= ze represents something of the grandeur of God. I like all the programs and mission opportunities they provide. I like the enormously talented staffs t= hat they are usually able to afford. Many people have deep needs met in large churches, and the better large churches really do proclaim the gospel in effective ways.

I g= rew up, however, in a small church. There I learned much about the idiosyncrasies of community. I learned the values of diversity (when folks got upset, no one could up and leave for another church; we were the only Episcopal church around!) For many years, howe= ver, that church remained quite small. Our parish and mission life developed a c= ycle of boom and bust, up to various renewal movements then down to depressed clergy, then back up to mission trips, then back down to tedious music and = dry liturgy. Lately, that parish has flourished with fine and healthy leadership among both its clergy and its people.

By “flourished,” I mean that the parish has grown in numbers of pe= ople and in numbers of dollars. I realize, of course, that growth can occur in o= ther ways; but, again, I like physical flourishing and growth. My own parish is quite large, and I know that unless we are growing in people and in dollars= , we might just be standing still.

But= what if there are limits to growth? Several books on natural economy proclaim that = very reality in the natural worlds of farming and energy production. I have eage= rly enjoyed those books in the interest of earth stewardship and sustainability. Some scientists claim that the world’s production of oil has actually reached its peak, and we do not realize it yet.

Mic= hel Pollan makes the same sort of point regarding the commoditization of agriculture in his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma. Once we determine everything’s value primarily in terms of its financial cost and reward, in dollar figures, and= in “yield per acre,” we actually begin to cultivate crops that are less nutritious and less healthy for us. Finding it cheaper to grow huge supplies of beef and corn with synthetic fertilizers, antibiotics, and horm= ones (mostly made with petroleum products), we feed ourselves with items that are missing key ingredients.

At = one point, Pollan contrasts industrial production with artisanal production. “Industrial farmers are in the business of selling commodities,”= ; he says, ever more cheaply so that the enterprise can grow profits (page 250).= On the other hand, artisanal production, “is based on selling something special rather than being the least-cost producer of a commodity” (age 250). Having read that, I considered our own communities of growth and health. Is there a size-limit = to the community where Christians can know authentic community and be challeng= ed to mission?

If = we get too large, do we lose the sense of “something special?” I belie= ve that point occurs when we begin to relate to religion as a commodity, as if church is only a delivery system for something sterile and industrial. Some= of the biggest mega churches today realize the principle of “artisanal production.” They arrange members in smaller cell groups of study and accountability. These churches are successful both because some larger structure and larger set of resources has enabled them, but also because th= ey remember the uniqueness of small communities of diverse faith.

Sma= ll groups, like small parishes, are where different seeds meet with different soils and wonderful fruits sprout. Small communities are where we learn to = be fascinated with individual searches and discoveries, those journeys of peop= le who become our true friends. A church, of any size, becomes sterile and lifeless when it begins to speak simplistically and to make faith into a “commodity,” like any big industrial producer.

A c= hurch which can change the world, however, knows the values of natural systems; “the efficiencies of natural systems flow from complexity and interdependence—by definition the very opposite of simplificationR= 21; (page 214) is how Michael Pollan puts it. What he writes about eating, a necessary and natural element of human life, is also true about praying, an equally necessary and natural element of life. Healthier prayer occurs in t= hose communities which are not afraid of complexity. Relatively speaking, those spiritual communities can be large or small. But they need complexity no ma= tter what their size. Healthy churches need complexity and interdependence in or= der to realize the grand and graceful mystery of life itself.

7 S= eptember 2007

Sam = Candler is Dean of the Cathedral of St. Philip in Atlanta, Georgia. Contact him at scandler@stphilipscathedra= l.org.
To read other reflections on Good Faith and the Common = Good >>&g= t; .

To b= e added to this distribution list, e-mail the Dean’s office and write “add me” in the subject line.

To be removed, contact us and write “remove me” in the subject line.=